9780674278776 - What Is the Mishnah? The State of the Question, distributed by Harvard University

Distributor link
Page 100, note 3: Levin should be Lewin

Page 300:

The intermediate days, couched between the first and last festival days, are called ḥol ha-moed

The term ḥol ha-moed does not appear anywhere in the Mishnah or indeed anywhere in classical rabbinical texts. The Intermediate Days are actually known as מועד or חולו של מועד in the Mishnah and early rabbinic texts.

Page 406: mBer 9:9 should be mBer 9:5
Page 407: מקבלין should be מקבלים
Page 407: נברא should be ניברא
Page 408: החיצונים should be החצונים
Page 418: from the word should be from the world

Page 3, note 3:

A rare case of a question in biblical law occurs in Ex 22:26: "On what will he lie down?"

This is not a question in the vein of "From when does one read the Shema in the evening?", i.e., a question designed to direct the reader's attention to new information. "On what will he lie down?" is actually a rhetorical question designed to justify the moral claim of the borrower to his security and make the fulfillment of the law easier for the lender. The Bible in fact has several examples of real questions introducing laws - e.g.: Num 9; 27; 36; Hag 2 -  so it is puzzling that this rhetorical question was given as the example.

Page 39, note 74: Le-toldot a nusaḥ should be Le-toledot nusaḥ

Page 49, note 8:

For a comprehensive collection of these compositions and fragments, see Donald W. Parry and Emanuel Tov, eds. Texts Concerned with Religious Law, 2 vols. (Leiden, 2004).

This book does not exist. The actual title is The Dead Sea Scrolls Reader and there are actually 6 volumes in the 2004 edition. The correct reference should be Donald W. Parry and Emanuel Tov, eds. 'Texts Concerned with Religious Law,' The Dead Sea Scrolls Reader, vol. 1. (Leiden, 2004).

Page 73: TOSEFTA should be TOSEFTAʼ
Page 73: corresponding Tosefta should be corresponding Toseftaʼ
Page 73: Midot should be Middot
Page 73: Kinim should be Qinnim
Page 129, note 1: be-tivnei should be be-tiurei
Page 150, note 49: freien und unfreien should be unfreien und der freien
Page 168, note 5: judischen should be jüdischen
Page 179, note 43: The Stance of the Saducees and the Essenes in regard to Eruv in Light of Rabbinic Literature should be The Attitude of the Sadducees and Essenes concerning ‘eruv hazerot during the Sabbath in Light of Rabbinic Sources
Page 189, note 4: Numbered should be Numerical
Page 215, note 29: Idea Ancient should be Idea of Ancient
Page 232, note 1: Kana Varman should be Cana Werman
Page 232, note 1: Revealing the Concealed: Interpreting and Halakhah in the Qumran Scrolls should be Revealing the Hidden: Exegesis and Halakha in the Qumran Scrolls
Page 254, note 4: sipurim should be hassippurim
Page 254, note 4: be-kivei should be be-kitvei
Page 254, note 4:

no page numbers

This is incorrect. The referenced source appears from page 569 to page 580.
Page 302, note 103: Hillel and Shammai should be the Houses of Hillel and Shammai
Page 311, note 19: Pesahum should be Pesahim
Page 311, note 19: 2020 should be 2002
Page 339, note 36:

According to some scholars the exclusion of Israelites from the altar is reflected in other late biblical sources, such as 2 Kings 12:10 (which speaks of priests collecting funds deposited within the sanctuary)

The verse actually speaks of the collection being done by the king's secretary - a layman -  together with the high priest. The verse is anyhow not relevant to altar access as the collection box was next the altar but not on the altar.
Page 361, note 20: Henrew should be Hebrew
Page 381: Urbach should be Urbach's
Page 441, note 60: A Note on Torah Be-ʾal should be A Note on the Term Torah she-be-ʿal
Page 467, note 73: Pegagogy should be Pedagogy
Page 505, note 57: Dor should be Dor Dor